Feedbacks or Redpen.ai?

Two browser-based ways to report a website issue, with different ownership of the review record.

Redpen.aiChoose Redpen.ai when screenshot or recording capture should feed an existing issue tracker.

FeedbacksChoose Feedbacks when the whole review application, screenshot storage, discussion and MCP endpoint must run on your infrastructure.

How the work moves.

Capture

FeedbacksChrome extension: screenshot any supported web page, draw with the pencil and discuss in a project thread.

Redpen.aiIts extension captures screenshots or video; reviewers can annotate reports and share them with a team.

Hosting & source

FeedbacksApache-2.0 backend, web app, extension, MCP and CLI. Run them with your PostgreSQL and private S3-compatible storage.

Redpen.aiThe cited Redpen.ai product uses an account and connected issue tracking services. It describes a hosted workflow.

Coding agents

FeedbacksScoped MCP access to the thread, replies, screenshot and owner-approved reviewer guidance. Expertise weights are advisory.

Redpen.aiThe cited guides focus on capturing actionable reports and sending them to a tracker.

Next step

FeedbacksClarify quick requests in the thread. Create and link GitHub Issues through your existing workflow when the work is agreed.

Redpen.aiIts site lists Jira, Azure DevOps and GitHub Issues integrations.

Get the Chrome extension Self-host Feedbacks

Sources and scope.

Checked 22 September 2026. This is a comparison of published product documentation, not a hands-on certification of every plan or deployment. Features and plans can change.

This page covers the current product at redpen.ai. The older design-review service at redpen.io is a different product.