Feedbacks or FasterFixes?

Both can put visual feedback in an agent's hands. Their deployment paths differ.

FasterFixesChoose FasterFixes if you want a site widget and automatic GitHub issue creation, and its documented services fit your deployment.

FeedbacksChoose Feedbacks if you prefer extension capture, threaded discussion and a complete self-hosted deployment without a required external job or email account.

How the work moves.

Capture

FeedbacksChrome extension: screenshot any supported web page, draw with the pencil and discuss in a project thread.

FasterFixesA website widget captures page, screenshot, selector and browser context.

Hosting & source

FeedbacksApache-2.0 backend, web app, extension, MCP and CLI. Run them with your PostgreSQL and private S3-compatible storage.

FasterFixesThe AGPL-3.0 application can be self-hosted. Its published production guide requires Inngest and a transactional email provider alongside PostgreSQL and object storage.

Coding agents

FeedbacksScoped MCP access to the thread, replies, screenshot and owner-approved reviewer guidance. Expertise weights are advisory.

FasterFixesIts MCP server lets agents read feedback and update status.

Next step

FeedbacksClarify quick requests in the thread. Create and link GitHub Issues through your existing workflow when the work is agreed.

FasterFixesIts GitHub integration can create issues automatically.

Get the Chrome extension Self-host Feedbacks

Sources and scope.

Checked 22 September 2026. This is a comparison of published product documentation, not a hands-on certification of every plan or deployment. Features and plans can change.